Who were the Pharisees?

The Pharisees appear on almost every page of the Gospels — questioning Jesus, watching His disciples, and drawing some of His sharpest words. Understanding who they were explains much of the conflict in the New Testament, and, according to the commentators, uncovers a danger that did not die with them.

The Name and the Ideal

The word itself describes the whole programme of the group. One reference work traces both the name others gave them and the name they chose for themselves.

This name was given to a religious school among the Jews; it is supposed to have been derived from the Hebrew word parash, meaning 'to separate.' It was given to them by others, their chosen name being chasidim, 'pious ones.' Josephus speaks of them as early as the reign of Jonathan (B.C. 161-144). They prided themselves on their superior holiness of life, devotion to God, and their study of the law. The Pharisees included all classes of men, rich and poor: they were numerous, and at times had great influence.

Morrish Bible Dictionary

That separation shaped how they lived among their own people, and it won them wide respect.

Their ideal was that of a select body in the middle of the Jewish people, a nation within a nation, marked off from the rest at least in outward association and outward practice. They did not (as the Sadducees did) conform to the secular world around them; they held aloof from the culture of Greece and the politics of Rome... But, though separate and aloof, they were highly respected by the public; to be "as touching the law, a Pharisee" was the highest religious commendation.

J. B. Crosland

Where They Came From

The party did not begin badly. Writers trace its birth to the return from exile in Babylon, when the nation had to decide how far to blend with the surrounding culture.

After the early enthusiasm of the restoration had died away... many of the more influential Jews lost faith in their separate calling and compromised to a greater or lesser degree with the heathenism around them. Others, condemning such unfaithfulness, sought support amid the prevailing weakness in a firm adherence to the law and a rigid exclusion of every non-Jewish element. These two tendencies gave rise to the two sects of the Sadducees and the Pharisees.

J. B. Crosland

Pharisees and Sadducees

The two groups are often named together, yet they stood at opposite poles. One summary sets them side by side:

The Pharisees were the strictly religious, orthodox-ritualistic class... They were well versed in the traditions of the elders, and occupied themselves with creating new commandments and strange interpretations of the law... The Sadducees were the rationalists, the unbelieving class.

Arno Clemens Gaebelein

The difference was doctrinal as well as temperamental. The Sadducees "say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit; but the Pharisees confess both."

As the Pharisees opposed the intrinsic righteousness of Christ, and the Sadducees the doctrine of His resurrection, so the principle of Pharisaism became newly the great source of public trouble in the Church, and sought to add to, and to legalise the truth which it could not deny, so that Christianity should cease to be grace.

J. N. Darby

Tradition Above Scripture

What made them collide with Jesus again and again was a body of teaching laid alongside the law of God.

These traditions of the elders were explanations, expansions and inferences drawn from the law by respected teachers of old. They dominated the minds of the Pharisees and quite clouded over the law of God; so much so that they broke the law in order to keep their tradition.

F. B. Hole

Religion Without God

In the story of two men praying at the temple, one a Pharisee and one a tax collector, the fault exposed is not irreligion.

The Pharisee does not represent a man who denies God, or who is not a religious man. He is religious, but such religion is the most damning thing about him. The evil is not merely his sins, but his religion: nothing is more blinding to himself and to other men, nothing more dishonouring to God.

William Kelly

Not All Alike

The Gospels record severe words against them, yet the same writers refuse to flatten every Pharisee into one figure.

The Lord severely rebuked all their pretensions, and laid bare their wickedness as well as their hypocrisy. It may be that because of the great looseness of the Jews generally, some at first sincerely sought greater holiness. Others, not sincere, may have joined the sect... Probably such men as Gamaliel, Nicodemus, and Saul were men of a different stamp, though all needed the renewing power of grace to give them what they claimed to seek.

Morrish Bible Dictionary

The Warning That Remains

Jesus told His own disciples to beware of the leaven — the spreading influence — of the Pharisees, which suggests the problem was portable.

The leaven of the Pharisee is religious pride, that which seeks a place, not in the world, but among the saints of God... It is easy to see the damage this has done in the profession of Christianity, but none of us is immune from this deadly poison.

Ministry of the Church of God

Summary

- Separated — the name means "separate one," and the group began as a sincere reaction against compromise after the return from Babylon.

- Strict — they were the ritualist party, admired by the public, holding the resurrection and angels where the Sadducees denied all three.

- Supplemented — traditions of the elders were added to the law until they clouded it, and men broke God's commandment to keep their own.

- Self-satisfied — the man in the temple shows the outcome: not the absence of religion, but a religion that blinds the man who holds it.

- Still with us — Jesus called it leaven for a reason; commentators warn that religious pride spreads, and no one is naturally immune.

Reviewed by Orion on August 19, 2026