In return for my love they accuse me, but I give myself to prayer.
The verse turns on a single, painful exchange: love goes out, and hostility comes back. What he does next is the hinge of the psalm: he prays. That raises two questions. Whose voice is this? And what do we do with the fierce curses that follow?
"I give myself to prayer"
The last clause is compressed, and one writer weighs what it does and does not claim.
William Kelly"And I [am, or am to] prayer." So the holy sufferer describes it. Instead of his love they were his adversaries, and he gave himself up to prayer as a result. How astonishingly true of the Lord! Yet no careful mind can apply the psalm to Him alone, or apply every word of it to Him even in a general way. There is nothing here about Christ as priest, or about His work of praying for others. Even less does it picture Him as the fountain and source of all prayer, however truly He may be so. The real thought is a man giving himself up to prayer in the presence of adversaries who have no cause against him.
So he does not just pray. He becomes prayer. Yet the same writer cautions: not every word of this psalm can be laid on the Lord.
Love as the provocation
Notice what the enemies are reacting to. Not a wrong, not a threat — love.
Hamilton SmithThe lying lips that laid false charges against Christ were moved by hearts that hated Christ. For this hatred there was no cause in Christ. In Christ there was only love that expressed itself in doing good to His enemies. The Jewish nation hated Him without cause, and He answered by giving Himself to prayer. His enemies plotted evil against One whose love only stirred up their hatred. Their hostility met no resistance from Christ. It drew out perfect submission, which took everything from God, and perfect dependence, which carried everything to God in prayer.
David's own wound
David lived this exchange himself. One writer ties the psalm to the men who turned on him, and names three of them.
F. B. HoleThe heading of Psalm 109 tells us nothing about the circumstances in which it was written. But judging from its contents, it seems very probable that, like Psalm 13, it grew out of the terrible experiences of Absalom's rebellion. That was when David became the victim of "the mouth of the deceitful," and was repaid "evil for good, and hatred for … love." Ahithophel's actions fit this description exactly. Shimei seemed to love cursing and to "clothe himself with cursing as his coat." And Absalom, the son David doted on, fits the words, "In return for my love they accuse me."
(Absalom was David's son. He led a revolt against his father, and Ahithophel and Shimei both turned on David during it.)
Silence toward men, speech toward God
His silence was not weakness. He had a resource, and He used it.
An Outline of Sound WordsIf then He was silent, if He took no revenge on His enemies, was it that He had no resource? Far from it. His resource was not to insult His enemies or turn on them. It was to turn to the Father in prayer. He can say, "In return for my love they accuse me, but I give myself to prayer." So Peter writes of the Lord in his letter, "When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly."
What to do with the curses that follow
Verse 4 sits just before some of the harshest words in the Bible. One writer warns against forcing them onto Christian ground. He assigns them instead to a faithful Jewish remnant in a day still to come.
The Bible TreasuryLook at those who try to Christianise what belongs to the Jew, and who say that the psalms of cursing belong to a barbarous age! How would Psalm 109:4-13 suit you? It is completely opposed to all we have been reading about the principles of the kingdom. It is opposed to the spirit of the Christian too. But it will be quite right for the remnant. So unless we learn to rightly divide the word of truth, we get into terrible difficulties. The whole Bible is for us, but not all about us. Some parts of the Psalms belong to the Lord Jesus only. Some belong to Him and to the remnant. And some parts we may apply to the Christian now, and to the remnant later on.
The prayer is answered
Read the next psalm and you find the reply.
Hamilton SmithIn Psalm 109, Christ waits on God to speak for Him, in answer to the wicked who spoke against Him. In Psalm 110 God does speak for Christ, in answer to that prayer. So Psalm 109 unfolds God's ways with Christ in humiliation, and Psalm 110 presents God's purpose for Christ in exaltation.
Summary
- Love — nothing but love provoked this hostility. There was no cause for it in Christ, only good done to His enemies.
- Prayer — the clause is close to "I am prayer." The sufferer gives himself wholly to prayer while adversaries hate him without cause.
- Silence — He did not answer insult with insult. He entrusted Himself to the One who judges justly.
- Division — the curses in this psalm are not the Christian's spirit. The whole Bible is for us, but not all of it is about us.
- Answer — Psalm 109 is the prayer of humiliation; Psalm 110 is God's reply in exaltation.